3 ms·
1. Amount of Rust training data isn’t as much as Go. 2. Golang syntax and style is very verbose yet simple. There’s not as many options nor programming languag
by bfung 5mo ago
1. Amount of Rust training data isn’t as much as Go.
2. Golang syntax and style is very verbose yet simple. There’s not as many options nor programming language to domain mapping needed as in Rust. Leads to needing less sophisticated LLM to spit out Golang than Rust successfully and efficiently.
- adastra22 5mo agoThis must really depend on your niche. I assume you do web stuff or something? Good luck finding any golang examples in a lot of other fields. Rust, on the other hand, is taking over the world in systems programming.
- coldtea 5mo ago>Good luck finding any golang examples in a lot of other fields. There are go examples (and full blown programs) for anything, from servers to Kubernetes and Docker.
- krilcebre 5mo agoBeen reading and drinking that kool-aid for some time until I realized it's just an internet bubble mumbo jumbo. Majority of systems are still written in C and C++, and will be for unforeseeable future.
- benjiro3000 5mo ago[dead]
- bfung 5mo agoJust reporting what I’ve experienced. No need to go with the ad hominem attack. I happen to lead a team with a major Rust infra project and I stand by the experience with usage across all the LLM models.
- adastra22 5mo agoWhat ad hominem?