3 ms·
>The data was returned to us. It was my understanding that the data was copied[1]. You wouldn't "return" data unless it was encrypted or the originals were del
by Cider9986 6mo ago
>The data was returned to us.
It was my understanding that the data was copied[1]. You wouldn't "return" data unless it was encrypted or the originals were deleted. I am confused on this phrasing but maybe it is standard idk.
This is bullish on Monero[2]. The January pump may have been from a hack as well[3].
Here is Shinyhunters website. Canvas was listed on it[4] and then removed[5].
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeTybKL1pM4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeTybKL1pM4
[2] https://search.brave.com/search?q=monero+price&rh_type=cc&range=1m https://search.brave.com/search?q=monero+price&rh_type=cc&ra...
[3] https://xcancel.com/zachxbt/status/2012212936735912351 https://xcancel.com/zachxbt/status/2012212936735912351
[4] https://archive.ph/4zD7f https://archive.ph/4zD7f
[5] https://archive.ph/NYWbJ https://archive.ph/NYWbJ
- avaer 6mo agoI guess the incentive is for the hackers to not leak, so they can get away with the next ransom.
- embedding-shape 6mo ago> You wouldn't "return" data unless it was encrypted or the originals were deleted The very next line from what you quoted: > We received digital confirmation of data destruction (shred logs). Now, color me surprised if they didn't delete it, but I'm guessing this is why they call it "returned", since from their beliefs, the data was deleted after it was "returned".
- mbesto 6mo agoThis is a good time to point out that when there is a data breach, data is rarely stolen. The real threat and harm is when data that is stolen is used against you.