3 ms·
In higher dimensional vector space, yes it can. Dimensionality gets bizarre in 1000-D space. Similarity and orthogonality express themselves in strange ways an
by jryio 5mo ago
In higher dimensional vector space, yes it can.
Dimensionality gets bizarre in 1000-D space. Similarity and orthogonality express themselves in strange ways and each dimension codes different semantic meaning.
Therefore, if the training data is highly consistent you are by definition reducing some complexity and/or encoding better similarity.
In Go the statement
result, err := Storage.write(...)
Is almost always going to be followed by
if err != nil { ... }
In a highly dynamic language you may not get
try { Storage.write() } catch (error) { ... }
Unless explicitly asked for.
- za3faran 5mo ago> In a highly dynamic language you may not get Being dynamic is secondary. A language that uses exceptions for errors does not always need to surround every try with a catch if the code doesn't need to. You have a top level handler that would catch everything.
- dnautics 5mo agoIt's a little bit old, but challenge you opinions about what matters for LLM agentic coding: https://github.com/Tencent-Hunyuan/AutoCodeBenchmark/blob/main/figures/exp_acb.png https://github.com/Tencent-Hunyuan/AutoCodeBenchmark/blob/ma...