2 ms·
Even as someone who uses a lot of AI, if you can't be bothered to at least give it a prompt like "Go through the documentation and comments in detail and remove
by jaggederest 6mo ago
Even as someone who uses a lot of AI, if you can't be bothered to at least give it a prompt like "Go through the documentation and comments in detail and remove any obvious AI shibboleths like emdashes, it's not x it's y, rule-of-three, 'delve', excessive grandiosity and flourishes, boldness, bullet points, etc", you should receive a brisk kick in the rear.
- jameslk 6mo agoI'd be curious to know if there is a list of these "AI shibboleths" somewhere
- jaggederest 6mo agoNot really but they jump right out at you after a few minutes chatting with it. I also asked the AI and it was pretty subjectively accurate, especially if you force it to cross reference with web searches and especially google's ngram corpus (you can readily see that 'delve' and some of the other rhetorical constructs are quite uncommon in human speech)
- tyushk 6mo agoWikipedia maintains a list of smells for LLM text. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Signs_of_AI_writing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Signs_of_AI_writing
- ramon156 5mo agoI feel bad about most of my comments since this is the thing I say too. If you can't be bothered to write shit, why would I read your shit?