3 ms·
> If they had built a tunnel to Rostock, things would have been different… That would’ve been an extremely long (and expensive) tunnel.
by skrebbel 5mo ago
> If they had built a tunnel to Rostock, things would have been different…
That would’ve been an extremely long (and expensive) tunnel.
- TazeTSchnitzel 5mo agoYes, and it would have required much more investment in rail upgrades in eastern Germany. I can understand why they didn't go for it.
- ianburrell 5mo agoThe Rostock bridge was proposed and this tunnel selected instead. My understanding is that the water farther east is shallower which makes bridge cheaper. But not enough to be chosen.