3 ms·
And humans produce 100% reasonable code or what? The kind of mess me and everyone I've worked with produces by hand is the inverse of that. Constant shortcuts a
by Kiro 5mo ago
And humans produce 100% reasonable code or what? The kind of mess me and everyone I've worked with produces by hand is the inverse of that. Constant shortcuts and lazy slop through and through. Never worked anywhere where the code wasn't an entangled disarray.
As soon as requirements change the abstractions fall apart and everything gets shoehorned.
- bluefirebrand 5mo ago> And humans produce 100% reasonable code or what? Humans can be held accountable for their own slop > The kind of mess me and everyone I've worked with produces by hand is the inverse of that Yes, it's frustrating to work with isn't it? So why are you so excited to make higher volumes of this low quality slop using AI?
- xXSLAYERXx 5mo agoI hear you. You're frustrated. Some people are having success with it. What have you tried to do with it? > Humans can be held accountable for their own slop If you're a human and AI writes code for you you are ultimately responsible.
- bigstrat2003 5mo agoThe only people having success with LLMs right now are people who don't actually care about quality. Anyone who cares about producing good work recognized a long time ago that LLMs are not fit for purpose, and isn't relying on them.
- Kiro 5mo agoFunny how you spend your days spreading this nonsense, like if someone would deny reality just because you keep repeating it. Everyone knows that what you're saying isn't true, so you're wasting your time.
- senordevnyc 5mo agoIt’s honestly kinda sad watching otherwise smart people have their cognition completely hijacked by their fear and insecurity. I had multiple comments on this post get downvoted because I shared my positive experience working with AI in my own company. Apparently that’s too threatening to some, who spend their time insulting the skills and intelligence of people who work with a technology they find threatening, rather than engaging their curiosity to understand what it’s good for and what it isn’t. Sad.
- abalashov 5mo agoNo, humans don't produce 100% reasonable code, but the nature of human mistakes, foibles and unreasonableness is very different from the kind slop farming yields.