5 ms·

It's amazing how biased the media is..even online. There are plenty of things on the Democrat side that are just as questionable..but they aren't talked about.

It's amazing how biased the media is..even online. There are plenty of things on the Democrat side that are just as questionable..but they aren't talked about. Why is that? Here is a good example: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57552225-38/senate-bill-rewrite-lets-feds-read-your-e-mail-without-warrants/ http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57552225-38/senate-bill-re...

stackcollision 14y ago
I don't think the point of this article was "Republicans are scummy", because everyone knows the Democrats are too. The only thing this article made me think was "Damn it, we were so close!"
jbooth 14y ago
Who's biased? The original doc was newsworthy and so is this. I'm sorry if that creates a problem for your loyalties. "The bias of the media is towards sensationalism and laziness"
deleted 14y ago
[deleted]
myko 14y ago
Your usage of Democrat in this post betrays your own bias. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democrat_Party_(epithet) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democrat_Party_(epithet)
mistercow 14y ago
I don't understand. You gave an example of something that "isn't talked about in the media" by posting a link to a major media outlet talking about it?
bane 14y ago
Feel free to post those things...right now we are talking about Republicans.
paulhauggis 14y ago
The responses to this prove my point. Thanks
- bane 14y ago
  what exactly was your point...your submission history isn't exactly jumping with submissions demonstrating it.
- nitrogen 14y ago
  A friend of mine used to think he was the best debater around. His primary technique? Declaring his argument proven without even making any claims.
bskap 14y ago
Because the thing being talked about in there never went before anyone in Congress. If you read the article, it reports on what three people said Sen. Leahy was discussing. The official word from the Senator is that he would not support such measures. http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57552687-38/leahy-scuttles-his-warrantless-e-mail-surveillance-bill/ http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57552687-38/leahy-scuttles...

stackcollision 14y ago

I don't think the point of this article was "Republicans are scummy", because everyone knows the Democrats are too. The only thing this article made me think was "Damn it, we were so close!"

jbooth 14y ago

Who's biased? The original doc was newsworthy and so is this. I'm sorry if that creates a problem for your loyalties. "The bias of the media is towards sensationalism and laziness"

deleted 14y ago

[deleted]

myko 14y ago

Your usage of Democrat in this post betrays your own bias. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democrat_Party_(epithet) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democrat_Party_(epithet)

mistercow 14y ago

I don't understand. You gave an example of something that "isn't talked about in the media" by posting a link to a major media outlet talking about it?

bane 14y ago

Feel free to post those things...right now we are talking about Republicans.

paulhauggis 14y ago

The responses to this prove my point. Thanks

bane 14y ago
what exactly was your point...your submission history isn't exactly jumping with submissions demonstrating it.
nitrogen 14y ago
A friend of mine used to think he was the best debater around. His primary technique? Declaring his argument proven without even making any claims.

bskap 14y ago

Because the thing being talked about in there never went before anyone in Congress. If you read the article, it reports on what three people said Sen. Leahy was discussing. The official word from the Senator is that he would not support such measures. http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57552687-38/leahy-scuttles-his-warrantless-e-mail-surveillance-bill/ http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57552687-38/leahy-scuttles...