3 ms·
LLM-designed sites like this are always so pompous. The obnoxious format does a disservice to what you’re trying to present.
by danabramov 5mo ago
LLM-designed sites like this are always so pompous. The obnoxious format does a disservice to what you’re trying to present.
- williamtrask 5mo agofwiw - i think the design looks good.
- danabramov 5mo agoI mean mostly the writing. The visual design is fine but the grandiose tone is clearly LLM, as well as attempt to be “data-driven” to an absurd degree. The screaming “DAMAGE” blocks, “body count”, “(EXHIBIT)”, “7.8X MORE SCANDALS PER YEAR”, all of this looks extremely stupid, screams LLM, and undermines the points the authors want to make.
- tibbar 5mo agoLLMs often seem to have trouble determining the severity of a bug/incident/problem in a vacuum. If you run an LLM over 1000 items in parallel and ask "is this bad," it will come up with reasons for it to be bad way more than it might if it were considering all 1000 at the same time.
- The_Blade 5mo agoit will be fine if we all take ivermectin
- AirMax98 5mo agoI do agree. The Gary Tan takedown page is equally sensational, kinda for no reason? There’s a lot to rag on with Gary, but this webpage makes it seemed like he killed a guy or something.
- eiiot 5mo agoSometimes I will see a domain on YC and immediately know it will be LLM-designed before clicking on the link. This was one of those projects. Wish they were more human and more understated.
- Loughla 5mo agoLLM designed webpages are fine. But they're just that. Fine. They're bland and average. Almost like they are designed by a system inherently selecting the average over time. I like people made pages better because there's generally a little more flavor of the designer. Unless it's like a wiki where I'm just digesting information, I'm looking for a little personal touch. Otherwise, what's the point? If the author or designer can't be bothered to actually put work in to the project, why should I put work into consuming it?