4 ms·
> The technique appears to be new: I haven't found a proper write-up of this, nor of any other provider-independent solution (but I'd welcome a correction). To
by skydhash 6mo ago
> The technique appears to be new: I haven't found a proper write-up of this, nor of any other provider-independent solution (but I'd welcome a correction).
To be frank, anyone that serious about security would probably log in via console, generate and retrieve the host key that way. And then any client would have strict verification enabled.
It's kinda the 101 of communication using public keys cryptography. You have to get hold of the public key in a secure manner first (direct contact or attestation by a third party).
Section 3.1 in Bruce Scheiner's Applied Cryptography discuss how to automatically solves MITM. But that's only important for M:N communications (TSL). For 1:1 communications where you can have secure exchange before hand, no need to go that far.
- dboreham 6mo agoAttacker might have MITMed the console.
- Arrowmaster 6mo agoIf they MITMed the console then they have probably MITMed the entire deployment process and now have the one time use key already.