Many followers of cyberlibertarianism see themselves as potential cyberlords, who can rule over their fiefdoms, but still under the protection of the king (stat

Many followers of cyberlibertarianism see themselves as potential cyberlords, who can rule over their fiefdoms, but still under the protection of the king (state/government). The hypocrisy becomes apparent when these entities grow large, and suddenly need state help to suppress competition. Phase 1: Skirt laws, move fast and break things. Regulations should be abolished. Steal as much as you can, if it means growth. Phase 2: Lobby politicians, beg for certain regulations to keep out competitors when you've become a monopoly.