3 ms·
I read the text myself and checked it with pangram, it's 95% plus human written (people hate hundred percent so the discount). So I'm asking myself if it is rag
by kappuchino 5mo ago
I read the text myself and checked it with pangram, it's 95% plus human written (people hate hundred percent so the discount). So I'm asking myself if it is ragebait or Idiocracy. I know that's harsh to say, but throwing in written by AI is harsh as well. (Analysis: Pangram believes that this document is fully human-written https://www.pangram.com/history/c59610e0-aba7-469c-b762-21f79846c2b4?ucc=6d3B1ad5MuQ https://www.pangram.com/history/c59610e0-aba7-469c-b762-21f7...)
- AuthorizedCust 5mo agoI wrote that piece, and I am human. BTW, AI checkers are garbage. Even though your stat is heavily in my favor, I urge you not to use that stuff. It is not rage bait. It's good-faith commentary on how a movement has become lost.
- kappuchino 5mo agoThanks for the reply. Um. In this particular text, I tend do disagree.