4 ms·

It was probably a bad goal anyway. Anonymity turned out to be a great tool for fascists, and privacy is not going to save anyone if the fascist shit properly hi

• trhway 5mo ago
  The opposing voices is what stops fascism. Without anonymity there are no opposing voices.
  • vga1 5mo ago
    My point is that once we reach fascism, the opposing voices stop mattering. I think it's naive to think that anything happening in the digital world can properly fight that. And since technological anonymity and privacy are clearly moving us towards fascism, it's not a net good anymore.
    • trhway 5mo ago
      >technological anonymity and privacy are clearly moving us towards fascism looks like we're talking different fascisms. I don't want to offend you, it is just that your phrase is like straight from "1984" (or from Russia today) - "war is peace" and the likes.
      • vga1 5mo ago
        >looks like we're talking different fascisms. Okay, what fascism are you talking about? I'm talking about the actual rising fascism that we see right now and which has boosted its influence via social media by a lot. >I don't want to offend you, it is just that your phrase is like straight from "1984" (or from Russia today) - "war is peace" and the likes. No worries, I've learned not to be offended by people being wrong.
    • lukan 5mo ago
      Hah, as if the fascists themself are in loving unity. (Or clear on the term itself) There were and will be opposing voices also in deepest fascism. More broadly, totalitarism is rather the term, where the whole society is total under control of one ideology. That can be fascism, but also other ideologies strive for that. But yes, allowing anonymous voices is one way to counter it.
    • Nasrudith 5mo ago
      You literally could not be more wrong that opposing voices stop mattering once fascism is reached. Doubly wrong because fascism isn't a binary. Thrice wrong in that you think that a lack of anominity and privacy would somehow be helpful for prevention when fascism already here!
  • dgellow 5mo ago
    That‘s something I believed 10 years ago, I honestly don’t see how that position can still be defended. What happened is the fascists benefited so much more from anonymity than any opposition. But I also don’t expect that removing anonymity would in itself improve the current world, things are at a point where people living in democracies are openly advocating for the destruction of every single liberal ideals. Sure that’s in part astroturfed by anonymous accounts but way too many people couldn’t care less if they real identity would be linked to those claims