8 ms·
Okay I'm only replying to this one reply but my point is relevant to all discussion re meaning. Always be suspicious of any statement about numbers that relies
by jmathes 18y ago
Okay I'm only replying to this one reply but my point is relevant to all discussion re meaning.
Always be suspicious of any statement about numbers that relies on the base. This property of 6174 is really a property of the number's representation in base 10. In another base, it's the same number, but doesn't have the same property. That's why it seems suspiciously meaningless.
- tel 18y agoOh, sure. My reply was more of a meta argument than really a defense of the meaning of 6174. There's no reason to say that there isn't some property of its representation in base N that isn't useful, but it's pretty unlikely to be general in any interpretation we're used to dealing with (thus the re-representation of "2").