4 ms·
I wouldn't call it countercultural. And Wayland actually runs on freebsd these days. I use Linux as well but I really like FreeBSD for a number of technical re
by wolvoleo 6mo ago
I wouldn't call it countercultural. And Wayland actually runs on freebsd these days.
I use Linux as well but I really like FreeBSD for a number of technical reasons. Like the ports collection, the jails, the first-class citizen ZFS.
And Gnome 3 doesn't really have anything to do with Linux. It is also available for FreeBSD if you want it (I don't, I hate the minimalist opinionated design style so I use KDE, also on Linux).
But I use Linux on servers where I run docker for example. It's not about "not using linux".
- skydhash 6mo ago> And Gnome 3 doesn't really have anything to do with Linux. There's a very hard push on getting Gnome 3 aligned to systemd. Gnome is actually my preferred DE on Linux when I choose to use one. But compatibility with Unix systems is becoming harder every day.
- wolvoleo 6mo agoYes even KDE recently introduced a new display manager that is completely tied to systemd. For that reason it's not supported on FreeBSD. But sddm still works of course. But it is a worrying precedent. From the gnome team this was to be expected because they are beholden to RedHat/IBM and the other big distros who push systemd heavily. But from the KDE team I didn't. I've stopped my monthly KDE donations for this reason. Just to send a message that this isn't ok.