11 ms·
Sigh, and what guardrails are common sense? Are those the same level of common sense as those advocated for guns ( and narrowed down at every possible opportuni
by iugtmkbdfil834 6mo ago
Sigh, and what guardrails are common sense? Are those the same level of common sense as those advocated for guns ( and narrowed down at every possible opportunity )? Some of us see this tech as possibly revolutionary and thanks to useful individuals calling for muzzling that tech we now have the worst of both worlds: centrally controlled, not really open ( weights are just weights -- though Meta actually deserves some credit here ), and heavily muzzled.
Clearly, powers that be learned all too well from internet rollout.
- Forgeties79 6mo ago>sigh, I stopped reading. No point in engaging this if that’s how you’re kicking things off.
- CamperBob2 6mo ago"Sigh" is indeed a thought-terminating cliche. So is "Common sense."
- Forgeties79 5mo ago“Sigh” is “I don’t respect you and will now talk down to you.” “Common sense” at least invites the question, “what do you consider common sense solutions?” and if I were to balk at that then clearly I’m not discussing the topic in good faith.
- CamperBob2 5mo agoBut it's just argument bait, isn't it? What are the odds that the guardrails you consider common sense will agree with my own? It's like how 90% of people might be in favor of "common sense gun control," but when you drill down and propose specific gun-control measures, you find that it didn't help a bit to start the conversation by invoking "common sense." We're seeing the same with AI.
- Forgeties79 5mo agoIt’s not “argument bait.” I’m making a point and people can discuss it with me or not.