3 ms·
>That’s required for public confidence. The federal rules are stricter. You're trying to hide behind a bureaucratic mumbo jumbo, which is how the likes on Nan
by joe_mamba 6mo ago
>That’s required for public confidence. The federal rules are stricter.
You're trying to hide behind a bureaucratic mumbo jumbo, which is how the likes on Nancy Pelosi can constantly beat the stock market by a wide margin, and yet not raise any legal eyebrows.
Not putting you in the same basket as her, just saying that just because there are rules in place, doesn't mean they have the desired preventing effect you talk about, because it's the enforcement that's lacking. Just because the policies keep YOU honest, doesn't mean they apply to everyone else.
>Unfortunately, you’re displaying the nihilist, uninformed perspective which put fascists in power. By saying the president is corrupt, but so is everybody else you’re implicitly supporting and endorsing the behavior. That’s what they want.
You're soo offtopic that it's laughable. Sure buddy, everyone with a different opinion than you is a fascist, only you have the right answer to everything from within your bubble.
Why do you think that special forces officer was arrested for insider trading but not Trump's friends? Now tell us again, how there's no legal double standards, and your legal mumbo jumbo prevents insider trading.
- Spooky23 6mo agoIt’s really simple. The president is a criminal backed by an authoritarian political party whose members of Congress refuse to do their jobs. That’s the difference between a Spiro Agnew or a Richard Nixon. Crooks, but without the same type of cronyism.