2 ms·

>> the parents are supposed to make choices for them Parents don't have any choice in this either. A child under 18 should be in full time education - there is

• chr1 5mo ago
  > Parents don't have any choice in this either. That's a very fucked up thing to say, governments or random strangers from internet do not have a right to decide how parent raises his child. Do you even have a child? > I like that you shifted "adults with 15 year olds" to 20 year olds with 16-17 year olds It was just my own experience, if you want another example in early years of Soviet Union there were 40 year olds learning to read with 6 year olds. And in general i don't see why any combination of ages should be a problem?
  • gambiting 5mo ago
    >>Do you even have a child I do. And like I said, you as a parent have a choice about the kind of school you send your child into. You don't have a choice whether they are in education or not. >>And in general i don't see why any combination of ages should be a problem? When you were at school were there many adult students in your classes? >>you want another example in early years of Soviet Union there were 40 year olds learning to read with 6 year olds. Yes, 100 years ago in the early days of the soviet union the classes were offered to everyone to increase literacy rates. I can assure you that throughout the rest of history of the soviet union you didn't have adults attending primary/secondary school, gymnasiums or other types of schools for children. Soviet union had schools for adults from very early on.