3 ms·
The Apollo photos already on NASA fileservers that were included in this dump are the most compelling to me. Strange how common the triangle of orbs is in terms
by kjkjadksj 6mo ago
The Apollo photos already on NASA fileservers that were included in this dump are the most compelling to me. Strange how common the triangle of orbs is in terms of sighting reports, and now we see that it was appreciated on the moon and documented as well.
The various reports in there of federal agents experiencing sightings also seem credible and equally bizarre and inexplicable.
I’m surprised as always that outside UFO based forums the reaction to this sort of information is basically nothing. People say well it must be x,y,z in the acceptable frame of reference and move on. Seems this was barely on the front page. I missed it and wondered where the thread on this must be and had to search for it.
A true scientist believes everything is possibly true, not that everything is false and must be established to be true.
- imafish 5mo agoThat, combined with the recording of Gemini 7 [1] and the debriefing of Apollo 11 crew (Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins) [2] is also what find I most compelling. These are highly trained astronauts, engineers and fighter pilots. In the case of Apollo 11, they went straight to a press conference and stated that they saw nothing out of the ordinary, basically lying to the public. 60 years later, and we still (presumably) have no clue what they saw, except that it was important enough to keep classified. [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMskFWK8Q3A https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMskFWK8Q3A [2]: https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/nasa-uap-d4-apollo-11-technical-crew-debriefing-1969.pdf https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/nasa-uap-d4-apol...