3 ms·
> we who use them a lot also get more proficient and learn where they can be used effectively vs not I think it’s always been obvious where an LLM could be use
by deadbabe 5mo ago
> we who use them a lot also get more proficient and learn where they can be used effectively vs not
I think it’s always been obvious where an LLM could be used effectively and where it cannot, if you understand how they work and don’t see them as magical.
The “increase in proficiency” is mostly people coming back to reality and being more intentional about LLM usage. There are no surprise discoveries here. One does not need to use an LLM a lot to get effective with them. A total noob could become effective on day 1 with proper guidance.
- ofjcihen 5mo agoI think you hit the nail on the head. I had been in this space for a little bit before it really became popular. I haven’t seen incredible gains in model competency. What I have seen though is people figuring out what works and what doesn’t.
- deadbabe 5mo agoIt’s pretty telling that ignoring LLMs entirely for a few years and then jumping in last minute after everyone has struggled through figuring out how to use them still puts you on the same level very quickly.
- embedding-shape 5mo ago> then jumping in last minute after everyone has struggled through figuring out how to use them still puts you on the same level very quickly Does it actually though? I've used agents for quite some time now, if someone who never used agents before want to put this to the test somehow, I'm open to try to measure this, reach out via email :)
- deadbabe 5mo agoWhat would you even propose as a test
- embedding-shape 5mo agoCan be anything, refactor of old thing, build new thing, change existing thing, something like "Do X in Y hours/days, then we compare the results", and we'll see if there is any differences. Do it a couple of times, you might be able to figure out how to measure it as you discover the better methodologies.