4 ms·
But I am talking about Zig and others who have the same stance. Zig has a very strict No LLM / AI contribution policy and it likely got in the way of the Bun ma
by rvz 6mo ago
But I am talking about Zig and others who have the same stance. Zig has a very strict No LLM / AI contribution policy and it likely got in the way of the Bun maintainers at Anthropic. From [0]
>> No LLMs for issues.
>> No LLMs for patches / pull requests.
>> No LLMs for comments on the bug tracker, including translation.
[0] https://codeberg.org/ziglang/zig#strict-no-llm-no-ai-policy https://codeberg.org/ziglang/zig#strict-no-llm-no-ai-policy
- vintagedave 6mo agoThey don't hate it. There's no antagonism that I know of there. I believe they want it to be fully human-authored and want low-hanging fruit items to be good onboarding for developers, not targeted by AI contributions. Simon Willison wrote a good blog post on it: https://simonwillison.net/2026/Apr/30/zig-anti-ai/ https://simonwillison.net/2026/Apr/30/zig-anti-ai/ The Bun pull request was refused for additional reasons: 'AI is entirely beside the point here...': https://ziggit.dev/t/bun-s-zig-fork-got-4x-faster-compilation-times/15183/19 https://ziggit.dev/t/bun-s-zig-fork-got-4x-faster-compilatio... None of this is, in the original comment's text, "hating... AI".
- merlindru 6mo agohow do you square that with the "no LLM translators" rule? i agree i dont think they hate LLMs but that one seems unreasonable and odd, and makes me wonder if its ideological after all