3 ms·
Unlike the proprietary stuff there isn't a strong built incentive to remove it.
by stuaxo 6mo ago
Unlike the proprietary stuff there isn't a strong built incentive to remove it.
- charcircuit 6mo agoOne incentive is that it makes for a simpler user experience.
- Craighead 6mo agoIt's absurd that you're actually taking the position you are
- charcircuit 5mo agoThe existence of security vs convenience trade offs is not absurd. Security isn't free to add to a product.
- traderj0e 5mo agoe2ee in Instagram would be absurd
- aeonik 5mo agoIt's an even simpler user experience to just publicly publish all private information. Can you imaging, I wouldn't even need to give my social security number to another org manually again. Anyone could just look it up. It would make things so easy for everyone.
- charcircuit 5mo agoIt's a trade off. If someone wanted they could keep reducing security to improve the user experience, but a product having bad security will be problematic. >Anyone could just look it up. Most people's SSNs have already been leaked or stolen so it's just security theater to pretend they are still private information.