3 ms·
Conspicuously missing in your argument is a link to a credible source with any evidence (or even 1st person testimony). It should be easy. Instead, I just see
by marshray 5mo ago
Conspicuously missing in your argument is a link to a credible source with any evidence (or even 1st person testimony). It should be easy.
Instead, I just see elaborate narratives about political motivations and garbage evidence like that laughably low-effort fake video presented in Congress by Representatives.
- keepamovin 5mo agoLol, what? Reads as zany non-sequitur in context - did you reply right? Your frame that any timing of this drop is disputed and requires evidence, I reject. If you say precisely which phrases you felt that about, your comment might be better.
- marshray 5mo agoOh, you were joking? Sorry, I encounter someone who believes exactly what you wrote at least once a week.
- keepamovin 5mo agoHaha Nooo, lol, not joking at all! And no, you do not encounter such as there's no person like me and you don't know me. You tried to fit a real person into a stand-in category in your head you're already tired of arguing with :) I get if you wanna pretend a joke to avoid dealing directly, as you've done here. Very crab like! Little crab. One would think a crab so experienced would be more deft at directness lol