3 ms·
It seems like there might be just a small vocal minority that hates AI art. Most people probably don’t care. I bet there were painters in the 1800s who talked
by RcouF1uZ4gsC 5mo ago
It seems like there might be just a small vocal minority that hates AI art.
Most people probably don’t care.
I bet there were painters in the 1800s who talked about how people hated photographs and how they were uncanny and creepy compared to paintings.
- tehjoker 5mo agoArt without human input is pretty meaningless. It's just pretty colors, even if well executed. I guess there are people that vibe purely on kitch aesthetics. They don't have good taste ofc, but I guess from a capitalist perspective that's a market. People are confused because since the 1960s literally the CIA intervened to disrupt the transmission of meaning in art, because it was a field dominated by "subversives" who were opposed to capitalism and imperialism. They promoted meaningless post-modern art that was purely aesthetic. So decades later, starved of good examples, people have no idea what art is anymore.
- monkpit 5mo ago“Art wasn’t supposed to look nice, it was supposed to make you feel something.” A weird facsimile of art that has no soul is entirely uninteresting.
- jatora 5mo ago[dead]
- krater23 5mo agoThen no one that makes art is in danger. AI is just replacing the 'Art' that is not really art and just some paid painting.
- monkpit 5mo agoIf you ask me, the rise of the term “slop” in recent years is a sign that a considerable amount of people do care.
- tasoeur 5mo ago[dead]
- happytoexplain 5mo ago>It seems like there might be just a small vocal minority that hates AI art. Certainly, clearly not For now. In the future, I despair that the next generations will adjust. Horrifying, but possibly true.