2 ms·

>Well the allegation that Corey Dunphy, working for the US Department of Justice and a friend of Nguyen, was armed, and made threats against employees who cross

>Well the allegation that Corey Dunphy, working for the US Department of Justice and a friend of Nguyen, was armed, and made threats against employees who crossed Nguyen to use his resources at the OIG to ruin their lives by destroying their credit and getting them declared as terrorists This is my point, it's a non-sequitur. Being armed is irrelevant. Millions of American citizens carry firearms everyday. Everything you mentioned has nothing to do with the firearm. Mentioning it is just a way of scaring people with irrationality. That aside, that Nguyen mentioned (from what I can tell) that Dunphy owned a weapon in a context where it seemed like he was making a threat is the real problem. Mentioning that a buddy/colleague owns a weapon as if they're going to go shoot somebody for you is...immature to the point of being psychotic... That's the more relevant part here, I just found the placement, phrasing, and framing of it in the filing to be pretty poor.

danso 14y ago
So if Dunphy works for the OIG...seems like someone should FOIA his emails and see if anything comes up related to this matter
- rdl 14y ago
  http://www.linkedin.com/pub/corey-dunphy/33/404/9b1 http://www.linkedin.com/pub/corey-dunphy/33/404/9b1 right? I see a postal dispute: https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:TRTRSY2PM0kJ:www.nalcbayarea.com/PDF%2520Files/Rong%2520Arbitration.pdf+&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESiVjoPx5kZLhogBNLye1JCHyajylAI6FU0cJQNpW7Jjw9Ga9XZKHZlpO5IYZsG1_w6RnATDDoZn8NClZHfIuEQ3kCkqwtJjSWaCjDNYIs2-4oeYEi0qqRMU0UFYZI2B5dTpJNmG&sig=AHIEtbRRZMONOONgtMVh9EoNhsZZJ3ktPg https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:TRTRSY2PM0kJ:... He's a US Postal Service Office of the Inspector General Special Agent. Which is interesting because 1) the USPS Postal Inspectors are no joke when it comes to the mails, but have exceedingly limited jurisdiction otherwise -- I assume this extends to their OIG as well, if not more so and 2) they are one of the least internally corrupt USG agencies (DEA is probably the worst; FBI and USSS are also pretty bad; various OIGs vary wildly down to HHS OIG; US Army CID and USAF OSI are probably the best). So maybe this claim is totally baseless, but I'd probably not brag about my post office friend's ability to put people on no fly lists or brandish his Glock.

danso 14y ago

So if Dunphy works for the OIG...seems like someone should FOIA his emails and see if anything comes up related to this matter

rdl 14y ago
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/corey-dunphy/33/404/9b1 http://www.linkedin.com/pub/corey-dunphy/33/404/9b1 right? I see a postal dispute: https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:TRTRSY2PM0kJ:www.nalcbayarea.com/PDF%2520Files/Rong%2520Arbitration.pdf+&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESiVjoPx5kZLhogBNLye1JCHyajylAI6FU0cJQNpW7Jjw9Ga9XZKHZlpO5IYZsG1_w6RnATDDoZn8NClZHfIuEQ3kCkqwtJjSWaCjDNYIs2-4oeYEi0qqRMU0UFYZI2B5dTpJNmG&sig=AHIEtbRRZMONOONgtMVh9EoNhsZZJ3ktPg https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:TRTRSY2PM0kJ:... He's a US Postal Service Office of the Inspector General Special Agent. Which is interesting because 1) the USPS Postal Inspectors are no joke when it comes to the mails, but have exceedingly limited jurisdiction otherwise -- I assume this extends to their OIG as well, if not more so and 2) they are one of the least internally corrupt USG agencies (DEA is probably the worst; FBI and USSS are also pretty bad; various OIGs vary wildly down to HHS OIG; US Army CID and USAF OSI are probably the best). So maybe this claim is totally baseless, but I'd probably not brag about my post office friend's ability to put people on no fly lists or brandish his Glock.