4 ms·

>Many americans suffer from this I'm a Ukrainian-American who's lived in Ukraine, Poland, and the US; have property/bank accounts in all three countries, and s

by alterom 5mo ago

>Many americans suffer from this I'm a Ukrainian-American who's lived in Ukraine, Poland, and the US; have property/bank accounts in all three countries, and speak three languages and Russian. The "Americans suffering from this" would be people saying what you just did. Please read my other comment up the thread where I provide more context. And please don't presume you have any idea on how others view the world. >The only other point of reference is Hitler and his modern reincarnation - russians Sure, let's just ignore the Muller's report which documents Russian collusion when discussing MAGA, let's ignore Russian invasion of Ukraine when discussing Poland, and let's ignore Russia's relationship with Orban, Fico, and PiS when discussing the anti-EU sentiment in the EU (particularly among rural voters). That will surely give us an enlightened, non-US-centric and non-myopic view. /s

postsantum 5mo ago
[flagged]
- alterom 5mo ago
  >This is so debunked that I consider other opinions held by you as a sign they are wrong as well "So debunked" by whom exactly? Please cite which parts of this report[1] you believe are false. Insofar as this discussion is concerned, I'll defer to the Cato institute, a conservative think tank. Quote: "Mueller concluded that the Russians did interfere, Trump was aware of the interference, he benefited from and encouraged the interference – e.g., Don, Jr. was eager to get and use information on Hillary Clinton – and he didn’t report the interference to the FBI. " That's the part pertinent to this discussion. Namely, that Russia did help MAGA in the US grow, and there's documented evidence of that. Russia's influence on rural Polish conservatives in stoking the anti-Ukrainian and anti-EU sentiment, and their open meddling in the politics of EU countries supporting MAGA-like sentiments in Hungary, Slovakia, and Poland, is similarly well-documented. I'm sorry that you appear to be triggered by seeing a reference to Muller's report. The points I'm making still stand though, and I hope you'll find the strength to comprehend them in spite of your reflexes. Thank you in advance. [1] https://www.justice.gov/storage/report_volume2.pdf https://www.justice.gov/storage/report_volume2.pdf [2] https://www.cato.org/blog/mueller-report-faqs https://www.cato.org/blog/mueller-report-faqs

by alterom 5mo ago

postsantum 5mo ago

[flagged]

alterom 5mo ago
>This is so debunked that I consider other opinions held by you as a sign they are wrong as well "So debunked" by whom exactly? Please cite which parts of this report[1] you believe are false. Insofar as this discussion is concerned, I'll defer to the Cato institute, a conservative think tank. Quote: "Mueller concluded that the Russians did interfere, Trump was aware of the interference, he benefited from and encouraged the interference – e.g., Don, Jr. was eager to get and use information on Hillary Clinton – and he didn’t report the interference to the FBI. " That's the part pertinent to this discussion. Namely, that Russia did help MAGA in the US grow, and there's documented evidence of that. Russia's influence on rural Polish conservatives in stoking the anti-Ukrainian and anti-EU sentiment, and their open meddling in the politics of EU countries supporting MAGA-like sentiments in Hungary, Slovakia, and Poland, is similarly well-documented. I'm sorry that you appear to be triggered by seeing a reference to Muller's report. The points I'm making still stand though, and I hope you'll find the strength to comprehend them in spite of your reflexes. Thank you in advance. [1] https://www.justice.gov/storage/report_volume2.pdf https://www.justice.gov/storage/report_volume2.pdf [2] https://www.cato.org/blog/mueller-report-faqs https://www.cato.org/blog/mueller-report-faqs