2 ms·

I'm not sure how I feel about this; wasn't part of the point of core.async to push all this stuff into channels? I'm not convinced that having a JS-style async

by tombert 5mo ago

I'm not sure how I feel about this; wasn't part of the point of core.async to push all this stuff into channels? I'm not convinced that having a JS-style async keyword is an upgrade.

Borkdude 5mo ago
This is about using a JS feature without bringing in any additional dependencies like core.async. You don't have to use it and you can still use core.async. This was the most asked for feature in the recent ClojureScript survey.
- tombert 5mo ago
  Fair, I guess I import core.async into every project implicitly so I forgot that it's a separate dep.