3 ms·
You conveniently left out the the "we have many" part of that sentence you quoted. No one is suggesting it's the entire generation, or that there aren't plenty
by phainopepla2 5mo ago
You conveniently left out the the "we have many" part of that sentence you quoted. No one is suggesting it's the entire generation, or that there aren't plenty of 20-somethings who socially very functional.
But there is evidence out there that Gen Z has higher levels of shyness and social anxiety than previous generations. I personally believe overprotectiveness is one causative factor among others, although I'm not sure whether the evidence is there.
- gchamonlive 5mo agoI didn't, read my original comment...
- phainopepla2 5mo agoYour "gripe" ignored it, even if you quoted it in your first comment.
- deleted 5mo ago[deleted]
- gchamonlive 5mo agoSure, so tell me what's "many"? 20%, 50%, 90%? Tell me how much semantic value what I left out gives the sentence.
- phainopepla2 5mo ago"Many" here means some value more than previous generations to the point that it's noticeable to the general public. It doesn't mean everyone.
- gchamonlive 5mo agoMy interpretation was many as in "the vast majority", which would qualify for "put an entire generation". Of course you can't have every single person fall under such a category, this is absurd and you are deliberately not giving me the benefit of the doubt just to nitpick. But in any case, is this even true? That this generation of 20 something, as OP said, "can't speak for themselves and are overly shy"? That's my gripe. I don't think it is, at least not in such an immediately obvious way. Hope it clarifies. If it doesn't I can only wish you a happy life.