3 ms·
This is so cool. For instance the asset FBI SEPTEMBER 2023 SIGHTING - COMPOSITE SKETCH indicated that “Actual site photo with FBI Lab rendered graphic overlay d
by angelgonzales 5mo ago
This is so cool. For instance the asset FBI SEPTEMBER 2023 SIGHTING - COMPOSITE SKETCH indicated that “Actual site photo with FBI Lab rendered graphic overlay depicting corroborating eyewitness reports from September 2023 of an apparent ellipsoid bronze metallic object materializing out of a bright light in the sky, 130-195 feet in length, and disappearing instantaneously.”
https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/2024-04-30-composite-sketch.pdf https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/2024-04-30-compo...
I wonder if there’s satellite imagery of this event, or maybe if in the near future we’ll have greater satellite coverage so we can corroborate these claims with imagery.
- deleted 5mo ago[deleted]
- aduffy 5mo agoI think I'm missing the excitement. This is an artist's rendering of a supposed massive orb in the sky? I am more impressed by the actual UAV footage that has been released previously.
- SunshineTheCat 5mo agoI feel like increasing each day, I cannot help but hear Squidward's voice when reading HN comments.
- fnordpiglet 5mo agoThe entire site is meant to distract you from asking where are the other files they’ve been required by law to disclose but have refused to. Mixing artist renderings with photography is just par for course MAGA conspiracy stuff.
- Arodex 5mo ago>I wonder if there’s satellite imagery of this event, or maybe if in the near future we’ll have greater satellite coverage so we can corroborate these claims with imagery. The more cameras we have (in everyone's pocket, in the streets, in the sky), the less "sightings" we have (of UFO and cryptids). Tells you something.
- 6stringmerc 5mo agoYeah, that an advanced intelligent entity, like me, is averse to having their photo taken by any old yokel who will post it online for clout. That’s the correct interpretation, yes?
- nolok 5mo agoNo the interpretation is that the more we could prove it if real, the less we do Sailors saw mermaids all the time too, I don't think they're all hiding under a rock since we invented the camera
- jayGlow 5mo agosailors also reported seeing kraken as well, they were eventually proven right with the giant squid.
- nolok 5mo agoExactly, that's the point : if it's true/right, we are now able to prove it with evidence. If it's not, suddently we don't see it anymore.
- wredcoll 5mo agoThey reported seeing a lot of other things as well. Rationalizing that as "they were right about big squids existing" is a bit of a stretch.
- Art9681 5mo agoIt wouldn't have the same appeal if they reported seeing "larger than average size squids we didnt know existed". Every story was embellished in a world without pocket cameras. And the further you go back, the more grand the fiction was. Tales of men splitting the sea and walking on water. It is all very highly entertaining.
- wredcoll 5mo agoWait, your argument is that aliens and bigfoot are just camera shy?
- ks2048 5mo ago> This is so cool. "cool" is not the word that comes to mind looking at this image.
- ptaffs 5mo ago...more comical. Word Art was used to create the rendering. I guess the original comment was sarcastic.
- booleandilemma 5mo agoda bomb, phat, dope?
- z500 5mo agoI'm confused. Aren't these supposed to be photos, or are we expected to be agog with 3D renderings?
- carlosjobim 5mo agoIt says SKETCH, what is confusing about it?