4 ms·

So "no" to Epstein, but "yes" to "aliens". That tracks.

by blastro 5mo ago

SV_BubbleTime 5mo ago
[flagged]
- cindyllm 5mo ago
  [dead]
- MSFT_Edging 5mo ago
  Once you understand that legitimacy of rule by the wealthy is the primary corner stone of the United States, you'll understand that even the wealthy who didn't participate in the Epstein coalition don't want to open that can of worms. It's why the Democrats keep only pushing social issues, they are captured and cannot make any radical change without losing the support of their wealthy donors. Another way to look at it, consider that every coup that occurred in South America was done extra-legally to protect American corporate/monetary interests.
  - deleted 5mo ago
    [deleted]
- vscode-rest 5mo ago
  Sponsors
  - SV_BubbleTime 5mo ago
    It’s a wild web of alliances if Biden and the DNC had evidence of Trump impropriety with Epstein which would be the absolute defined end of Trump, and refused to play even that small bit in the event that it implicated a Sponsor too.
    - vscode-rest 5mo ago
      That would not end Trump in any way. Just as it has not ended any politicians at all. Consider: if Kamala ended up on the files, would any liberals vote for Trump? But, for a random wealthy donor it’d be rather inconvenient to be in the files and they’ll pay for not being included in the releases. And: a sponsor? Think: most sponsors, and the establishment politicians.
- mejari 5mo ago
  Because he legally was not allowed to as they were still in active use in legal proceedings.
  - SV_BubbleTime 5mo ago
    Which legal proceedings and what date did they end? I looked into this and found no facts to support it.
    - mejari 5mo ago
      https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn8e2kvzen7o https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn8e2kvzen7o
      - SV_BubbleTime 5mo ago
        Those were released and have nothing implicating Trump. In fact, can you point to anything that has implicated Trump in wrong doing?
        mejari 5mo ago
        Sorry, did you forget the comment chain you were commenting on? This wasn't about files that were currently unreleased, it was discussing why Biden didn't release them during his presidency. As far as Trump goes, yes, he's implicated all over the files. A simple search on any search engine will find plenty of examples for you.
        SV_BubbleTime 5mo ago
        Obama and Biden didn’t release any though. Not one. Instead… The entire DNC spent a billion and a half on an election just on 2024 to lose historically. Lawfare. States trying to remove Trump from the ballots… all the had to do was release even one incriminating file. You must have seen files I haven’t. Please link to a file that implicates Trump in wrong doing.
- xp84 5mo ago
  Personally I think anyone who believes there’s a stack of “files” sitting somewhere which culminate in a spreadsheet of “Famous politician / # of underage girls we can prove he assaulted” is fantasizing and thinking the world is just like an exciting John Grisham novel. Anyone who’s guilty of that either has sufficient corrupt clout to have eliminated the evidence of their crimes (thus no “files” threaten them), or, are already known about. And come on, with the guy at the top of the government being very likely one of them and very openly and obviously corrupt, it is more of a stretch for me to believe that “Epstein permanent deletion service” isn’t an item on his main bribe menu.

So "no" to Epstein, but "yes" to "aliens". That tracks.

by blastro 5mo ago

So "no" to Epstein, but "yes" to "aliens". That tracks.

SV_BubbleTime 5mo ago

[flagged]

cindyllm 5mo ago
[dead]
MSFT_Edging 5mo ago
Once you understand that legitimacy of rule by the wealthy is the primary corner stone of the United States, you'll understand that even the wealthy who didn't participate in the Epstein coalition don't want to open that can of worms. It's why the Democrats keep only pushing social issues, they are captured and cannot make any radical change without losing the support of their wealthy donors. Another way to look at it, consider that every coup that occurred in South America was done extra-legally to protect American corporate/monetary interests.
- deleted 5mo ago
  [deleted]
vscode-rest 5mo ago
Sponsors
- SV_BubbleTime 5mo ago
  It’s a wild web of alliances if Biden and the DNC had evidence of Trump impropriety with Epstein which would be the absolute defined end of Trump, and refused to play even that small bit in the event that it implicated a Sponsor too.
  - vscode-rest 5mo ago
    That would not end Trump in any way. Just as it has not ended any politicians at all. Consider: if Kamala ended up on the files, would any liberals vote for Trump? But, for a random wealthy donor it’d be rather inconvenient to be in the files and they’ll pay for not being included in the releases. And: a sponsor? Think: most sponsors, and the establishment politicians.
mejari 5mo ago
Because he legally was not allowed to as they were still in active use in legal proceedings.
- SV_BubbleTime 5mo ago
  Which legal proceedings and what date did they end? I looked into this and found no facts to support it.
  - mejari 5mo ago
    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn8e2kvzen7o https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn8e2kvzen7o
    - SV_BubbleTime 5mo ago
      Those were released and have nothing implicating Trump. In fact, can you point to anything that has implicated Trump in wrong doing?
      - mejari 5mo ago
        Sorry, did you forget the comment chain you were commenting on? This wasn't about files that were currently unreleased, it was discussing why Biden didn't release them during his presidency. As far as Trump goes, yes, he's implicated all over the files. A simple search on any search engine will find plenty of examples for you.
        SV_BubbleTime 5mo ago
        Obama and Biden didn’t release any though. Not one. Instead… The entire DNC spent a billion and a half on an election just on 2024 to lose historically. Lawfare. States trying to remove Trump from the ballots… all the had to do was release even one incriminating file. You must have seen files I haven’t. Please link to a file that implicates Trump in wrong doing.
xp84 5mo ago
Personally I think anyone who believes there’s a stack of “files” sitting somewhere which culminate in a spreadsheet of “Famous politician / # of underage girls we can prove he assaulted” is fantasizing and thinking the world is just like an exciting John Grisham novel. Anyone who’s guilty of that either has sufficient corrupt clout to have eliminated the evidence of their crimes (thus no “files” threaten them), or, are already known about. And come on, with the guy at the top of the government being very likely one of them and very openly and obviously corrupt, it is more of a stretch for me to believe that “Epstein permanent deletion service” isn’t an item on his main bribe menu.