Watts and sustainability were never part of the Turing test, of course. It was conceived as more of a philosophical argument than a practical test. For instan

Watts and sustainability were never part of the Turing test, of course. It was conceived as more of a philosophical argument than a practical test. For instance, consider Searle's Chinese Room counter argument [1]: Millions of humans emulating a computer program isn't the most efficient use of resources either, off course. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_room https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_room