> Bayesian methods are also inconsistent wrt infinitely small changes in priors. See Wasserman's blog for more details. That looks like it would falsify the me

> Bayesian methods are also inconsistent wrt infinitely small changes in priors. See Wasserman's blog for more details. That looks like it would falsify the method instantly. Or are you talking about merely small changes in priors? Anyway, I can't find the details you speak of, do you have a link? As for the likelihood principle, my math is rusty at the moment, I'll check. I expect however that I will just accept this principle as obvious. People don't believe it? They probably had the wrong teachings, just like most religious people. I'm not sure I know on a gut level how hopelessly wrong people often are. I'm not sure I properly feel the fear that should come with the possibility that I am hopelessly wrong. But I have an idea.