6 ms·

The longest route on the NYC subway is precisely when you have an appointment and the train decides to stop because there's electrical issues, someone jumped on

The longest route on the NYC subway is precisely when you have an appointment and the train decides to stop because there's electrical issues, someone jumped on the track, "there's a train stopped ahead of us", the express decides to go local instead, someone is holding the door, your route involves the F/G or any line that serves less affluent neighborhoods...

master_crab 5mo ago
Are you saying F/G AND any line serving less affluent areas? Because if not, the G (save for maybe 2-3 stops in Bed-Stuy) is all affluent neighborhoods.
- saalweachter 5mo ago
  Pfft, there's no G train, it's just a psych experiment to see how long people will wait at a fake train station before giving up and seeking alternative transportation.
- rafram 5mo ago
  Right! I don't have hard data on this, but I would guess the only line that spends more of its run in affluent areas is the Q.
jareklupinski 5mo ago
there's a reason even the announcer says "transfer here to the F'in G line"
grishka 5mo ago
On the one hand, this sort of thing feels inexcusable to me. In my mind, the subway is the most reliable mode of city transportation. On the other, the NYC subway is one of the few 24/7 subway systems in the world, which makes me envious somewhat. Ours closes at midnight and opens around 5 AM.
- afavour 5mo ago
  IMO the subway reliability issues are overblown these days. In the 2010s it was in a really dark spot but it's doing a lot better these days. > In my mind, the subway is the most reliable mode of city transportation. Even with its problems the NYC subway still is. Traffic is a nightmare. I have friends who insist on taking a cab to the airport because it's more reliable then end up complaining because they're still on the Belt Parkway or whatever.
  - busterarm 5mo ago
    In the 2010s it was so bad that I gave up on the subway and either walked, Ubered or took the bus everywhere. When the MTA bus is better than the subway, things in NY are grim -- it was like the 80s & early 90s again. The reliability has improved a bit, but the subway crime is also way, way up. So yeah, still a hard pass. In the mid 2010s i had a reverse commute from Manhattan to Brooklyn and there was a few months where 3 days a week my full commute would take 2hr+ (midtown to sunset park) because the train just sat multiple times not moving. Especially on the bridge where it could be up to an hour just stopped. The absolute worst time that I ever remember though was maybe in '89 or '90. The Lex-53rd st E/F station had a ton of ongoing construction and on weekends it was being used as a transfer station only that summer. All the staircases were closed and you could only get in/out via train -- this idea seems insane to me but that's NYC sometimes and especially in that era. Anyway, my family and I were on a train passing through that station one Saturday or Sunday morning on the way to Queens and they made us exit the train inside the station as it was going out of service. Apparently a pipe had burst (I think?) and no trains were in service. The AC in the station was not working and it was maybe 90+ degrees underground. Plus water was leaking from everywhere. And there were hundreds of us trapped on a crowded, wet, dirty platform for like 4-6 hours while no trains were running and there was no way to get out. Aside: that Belt Parkway story is why people from NY who live/work in Manhattan try to never fly out of JFK. That's the real solution. So much easier to get to EWR/LGA.
    - afavour 5mo ago
      > The reliability has improved a bit, but the subway crime is also way, way up. Eh, it’s all relative, I think you’re in less danger of experiencing issues on the subway than you are getting hit on the road. I take the subway all the time and have never had any problems.
afavour 5mo ago
> or any line that serves less affluent neighborhoods... Are there any lines that don’t, at some point, serve less affluent neighborhoods? The midtown shuttle I suppose…

master_crab 5mo ago

Are you saying F/G AND any line serving less affluent areas? Because if not, the G (save for maybe 2-3 stops in Bed-Stuy) is all affluent neighborhoods.

saalweachter 5mo ago
Pfft, there's no G train, it's just a psych experiment to see how long people will wait at a fake train station before giving up and seeking alternative transportation.
rafram 5mo ago
Right! I don't have hard data on this, but I would guess the only line that spends more of its run in affluent areas is the Q.

jareklupinski 5mo ago

there's a reason even the announcer says "transfer here to the F'in G line"

grishka 5mo ago

On the one hand, this sort of thing feels inexcusable to me. In my mind, the subway is the most reliable mode of city transportation. On the other, the NYC subway is one of the few 24/7 subway systems in the world, which makes me envious somewhat. Ours closes at midnight and opens around 5 AM.

afavour 5mo ago
IMO the subway reliability issues are overblown these days. In the 2010s it was in a really dark spot but it's doing a lot better these days. > In my mind, the subway is the most reliable mode of city transportation. Even with its problems the NYC subway still is. Traffic is a nightmare. I have friends who insist on taking a cab to the airport because it's more reliable then end up complaining because they're still on the Belt Parkway or whatever.
- busterarm 5mo ago
  In the 2010s it was so bad that I gave up on the subway and either walked, Ubered or took the bus everywhere. When the MTA bus is better than the subway, things in NY are grim -- it was like the 80s & early 90s again. The reliability has improved a bit, but the subway crime is also way, way up. So yeah, still a hard pass. In the mid 2010s i had a reverse commute from Manhattan to Brooklyn and there was a few months where 3 days a week my full commute would take 2hr+ (midtown to sunset park) because the train just sat multiple times not moving. Especially on the bridge where it could be up to an hour just stopped. The absolute worst time that I ever remember though was maybe in '89 or '90. The Lex-53rd st E/F station had a ton of ongoing construction and on weekends it was being used as a transfer station only that summer. All the staircases were closed and you could only get in/out via train -- this idea seems insane to me but that's NYC sometimes and especially in that era. Anyway, my family and I were on a train passing through that station one Saturday or Sunday morning on the way to Queens and they made us exit the train inside the station as it was going out of service. Apparently a pipe had burst (I think?) and no trains were in service. The AC in the station was not working and it was maybe 90+ degrees underground. Plus water was leaking from everywhere. And there were hundreds of us trapped on a crowded, wet, dirty platform for like 4-6 hours while no trains were running and there was no way to get out. Aside: that Belt Parkway story is why people from NY who live/work in Manhattan try to never fly out of JFK. That's the real solution. So much easier to get to EWR/LGA.
  - afavour 5mo ago
    > The reliability has improved a bit, but the subway crime is also way, way up. Eh, it’s all relative, I think you’re in less danger of experiencing issues on the subway than you are getting hit on the road. I take the subway all the time and have never had any problems.

afavour 5mo ago

> or any line that serves less affluent neighborhoods... Are there any lines that don’t, at some point, serve less affluent neighborhoods? The midtown shuttle I suppose…