Much of what I see is science generally avoids making claims that are not proven--but people want answers. When a reporter gets hold of something like China sa

Much of what I see is science generally avoids making claims that are not proven--but people want answers. When a reporter gets hold of something like China saying there is no evidence it's airborne they treat it like China saying that it isn't airborne. No--that wasn't incorrect, that was a lack of data. They didn't have a non-human host, it wasn't a disease where it would be reasonable to expose people and see what happens, data collection is going to be limited. But China saw it was probably airborne and reacted as if it were. We had the same data, we could reach the same conclusions, but we didn't want to.