3 ms·
I would argue that http://htmldog.com/ http://htmldog.com/ or the MDN (https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/ https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/) are much bette
by nickpresta 14y ago
I would argue that http://htmldog.com/ http://htmldog.com/ or the MDN (https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/ https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/) are much better resources for even the newbie. Correct information always trumps easily accessible information. It isn't like the MDN is hard to navigate or anything, anyways.
For comparison sake:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/HTML/Element/article https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/HTML/Element/articl...
http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_article.asp http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_article.asp
With the exception of the "try it yourself" link, the MDN page has everything the W3School's page has, and then some, as well as being more accurate as it contains version numbers, links to the spec, as well as related usage notes.
- ChuckMcM 14y agoThere is a huge difference between w3schools and these web sites, you can type in stuff on one side and see it on the other. I know that seems silly but its so helpful for people learning, is there anywhere else where they have that sort of setup?
- nickpresta 14y agoThere are many sites like that. The one I use most frequently is http://jsfiddle.net/ http://jsfiddle.net/
- carey 14y agoMozilla have their own called Thimble at https://thimble.webmaker.org/ https://thimble.webmaker.org/. Some more interaction between MDN and Thimble would be nice.
- aw3c2 14y agoThe w3schools link shows the example right away, with the Mozilla link I have scroll half way down the page to find it.