5 ms·
That's a privacy violation, not relevant.
by IAmLiterallyAB 5mo ago
That's a privacy violation, not relevant.
- 2ndorderthought 5mo agoNo it's not. You exposed that data to an LLM. Should have read the fine print. The laws around that don't make sense to me anymore so therefore I own that stuff now. That's how this works right? You do know chatgpt etc can read everything you write, right? Also social media profile pics. Great way to get faces for deep fake ads. Most people are just 1 phone call away from being voice cloned. Our likeness isn't all that important either if you think about it. Maybe meta will clone your writing style and sign into your meta account and message your friends telling them about this awesome new product. Meta owns the account and you uploaded data to it.
- Our_Benefactors 5mo agoLiterally none of these things are defensible positions, so nobody will take you seriously.
- 2ndorderthought 5mo agoMany of the things I wrote are already happening. The others probably are but haven't been reported yet.
- collabs 5mo agoI think Anthorpic has pledged to not use team and enterprise user's data for training purposes. I don't mind if they do some verification or whatever as long as it doesn't end up in the responses it gives others.
- KPGv2 5mo agoyes yes and google pledged "don't be evil" Don't be naïve. A corporation would tear the flesh from your body if it meant a better quarterly earnings report.
- 2ndorderthought 5mo agoHaving seen someone die at work, this is factual. The comments made during and after were eye opening.
- HWR_14 5mo agoWhat Silicon Valley company over a decade old has respected the limitations on using data that they agreed to? At least any valuable data.
- 2ndorderthought 5mo agoI have an amazing timeshare for sale and you seem like someone who would really see the opportunity this provides. How are your financials?