4 ms·
To be fair marketing vibing content pages is different from managers vibing code that powers a trading app for example.
by tacker2000 5mo ago
To be fair marketing vibing content pages is different from managers vibing code that powers a trading app for example.
- BLKNSLVR 5mo agoI was thinking the same thing. Advertising or the wording and layout of information on a website is a different level of complexity to monetary calculations that have legislated paths and outcomes, for example. As difficult as it is to use CSS to centre a field, the stakes are in a different ball park.
- claytonjy 5mo agoYeah this sounds pretty reasonable really, like instead of using a CMS directly they’re having Claude file PRs to make the same changes. As someone who likes static sites and change control, it actually sounds like an improvement.
- alt227 5mo agoIf as a developer all you want your job to be is checking ai generated PRs then this is a great step!
- toraway 5mo agoDespite my own personal preference for static sites, marketing using a CMS under their own control to make content updates seems vastly more reasonable than vibe coding open ended PRs as a codebase they don't understand gradually grows in complexity over time. They could even use one of many headless CMSs combined with a static generator. Claude Code in the hands of non-technical users deploying to prod regularly seems like one of the worst possible ways to do it (except for the "cool" value telling people about it). At my company the internal devs don't even have access to wherever the company site is hosted, it's a WordPress CMS and marketing can make updates safely with a couple clicks and zero day-to-day development oversight required. IT just helps keep the box updated but otherwise it's entirely their own thing.