3 ms·
The issue is certainly not so simple. But it seems to me, purely theoretically, that the rules don't necessarily have to be the same for living people and non-l
by NoOn3 5mo ago
The issue is certainly not so simple. But it seems to me, purely theoretically, that the rules don't necessarily have to be the same for living people and non-living machines.
- qarl 5mo agoWell - actually - it is pretty simple. For something to be illegal, there must be a law saying it's illegal. There are no laws distinguishing humans from machines in copyright law.
- triceratops 5mo ago> There are no laws distinguishing humans from machines in copyright law Correct. Because until very recently there was no need.
- qarl 5mo agoAH. So you agree that it's not illegal.
- triceratops 5mo agoWhat isn't?
- qarl 5mo agoI'm just happy you agree with me.
- triceratops 5mo agoI don't agree with most of what you've said on this discussion. I couldn't have been clearer about that in my other replies. The only part I did agree on was a hypothetical that hasn't happened.
- deleted 5mo ago[deleted]
- qarl 5mo ago[dead]