2 ms·
Yes, I have no objection to that part. It's the arguments that training itself is the problem. Sarah Silverman as the most prominent example.
by qarl 6mo ago
Yes, I have no objection to that part. It's the arguments that training itself is the problem.
Sarah Silverman as the most prominent example.
- jryan49 6mo agoI mean the act of reproducing the copyrighted material is what is illegal. LLMs I've used for coding has outputted exact copyrights for code verbatim into my code before. When that happens it feels kind of fishy to be honest.
- qarl 6mo agoYes. I agree. But many people argue that training itself is a copyright violation. That's the position I'm countering here.