4 ms·
We don't have AI. We have language models trained by rapacious companies on copyrighted material with no concern for copyright violations and with a penchant f
by themafia 5mo ago
We don't have AI. We have language models trained by rapacious companies on copyrighted material with no concern for copyright violations and with a penchant for intentionally anthropomorhizing their models.
I'm an anti corporate malfeasance activist.
Hacker News and it's underemployed and underpaid user base gets these two confused all the time. I assure you, your tolerance for language models, or your willingness to use them, will have _zero_ impacts on your pay scale in the coming decade.
Finally you should be aware that Google markets this addition as an "anti fraud" and "anti spam" feature. They should have to justify that, I shouldn't have to justify my expectations as a consumer.
- wahnfrieden 5mo agoIt's not a copyright violation if courts have ruled it's not I have no pay scale to worry about, I own the software I build and don't rely on wages
- themafia 5mo ago> It's not a copyright violation if courts have ruled it's not Courts can't rule aprioi on civil issues. I would not expect the current status quo to count for anything. > I own the software I build and don't rely on wages Cool. So now everyone with $200 is your competition. It seems like a fools paradise to me.
- account42 5mo agoIt is if we as a society decide it is.