3 ms·
This is such a motte-and-bailey argument. Whenever people point out LLMs aren't actually intelligent then you're an anti-AI Luddite. But whenever an AI does som
by armada651 5mo ago
This is such a motte-and-bailey argument. Whenever people point out LLMs aren't actually intelligent then you're an anti-AI Luddite. But whenever an AI does something catastrophically dumb it's absolved of all responsibility because "it's just predicting the next token".
I'm getting so tired of this.
- kbrkbr 5mo agoI think they are not actually intelligent. Fix all random seeds and other sources of randomness, and try the same prompt twice, and check how intelligent that looks, as a first approximation. On a more technical level very serious people have voiced doubts, for example Richard Sutton in an interview with Dwarkash Patel [1]. [1] https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=21EYKqUsPfg&pp=ygUnZmF0aGVyIG9mIHJsIHRoaW5rcyBsbG1zIGFyZSBhIGRlYWQgZW5k0gcJCd4KAYcqIYzv https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=21EYKqUsPfg&pp=ygUnZmF0aGVyIG9...