3 ms·
Despite not publicly moving away from what has been said about Sam* Jessica Livingston's personal stake in OpenAI is maybe at most 0.1% or less and Paul Graham
by oliculipolicula 6mo ago
Despite not publicly moving away from what has been said about Sam*
Jessica Livingston's personal stake in OpenAI is maybe at most 0.1% or less and Paul Graham's, afaik, is 0.
So the bias doesn't seem as large as OP thinks
*https://xcancel.com/paulg/status/2041366050693173393 https://xcancel.com/paulg/status/2041366050693173393
And "toughness, adaptability, and determination"
>>> "ambition", frankly
- chis 6mo agoSuch suspicious phrasing lol. So you’re saying Paul Graham and his wife Jessica have 800 MILLION dollars worth of OpenAI stock, and that’s not so significant?
- oliculipolicula 6mo agoWe're forced to decide whether 0.8B is enough to risk her credibility over, or, if it matters to us, gather more information first
- anewhnaccount2 6mo agoExactly! It's only $0.0008T. Pocket change really...
- JumpCrisscross 6mo agoHas The Information broken any critical news about OpenAI? I never connected the dots around why I started finding it increasingly in worth paying for over the last year or two, but editorial bias feels correct.
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- crowcroft 6mo agoWhat is 0.1% of a trillion? I think that's quite a large number still.
- bitmasher9 6mo agoOpenAI’s last post-money valuation was less than a trillion. They’ll probably cross that point in the future, but let’s not get ahead of ourselves.
- kibibu 6mo agoIt was $852 billion - 0.1% of which is $852 million
- clickety_clack 6mo agoOnly a Sith deals in absolutes...
- kibibu 6mo agoDoes Paul Graham no longer have a stake in Y Combinator?