4 ms·
The gp's interpretation of that tweet is such a completely incorrect reading as to make one think it's likely disingenuous.
by shadowfiend 5mo ago
The gp's interpretation of that tweet is such a completely incorrect reading as to make one think it's likely disingenuous.
- slopinthebag 5mo ago> I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. How is it an incorrect interpretation? Jared is indeed pitching/suggesting/predicting that human contribution will not be allowed in the near future, i.e. banned.
- Philpax 5mo agoA prediction is not a policy.
- sandbags 5mo agoWhen you use the word “allowed” it becomes a policy.
- NewsaHackO 5mo agoNo, it doesn't.
- sandbags 5mo agoWhat would be required for you to see it as a policy?
- kelnos 5mo ago"Pitching" generally means that the person making the pitch is endorsing and pushing for it. (This might also be a regional word meaning/usage difference type thing.) The person upthread should have said "predicting".