3 ms·
Where is a source for either of these extraordinary claims?
by jabedude 6mo ago
Where is a source for either of these extraordinary claims?
- csande17 6mo agohttps://x.com/jarredsumner/status/2048434628248359284 https://x.com/jarredsumner/status/2048434628248359284
- shadowfiend 6mo agoThe gp's interpretation of that tweet is such a completely incorrect reading as to make one think it's likely disingenuous.
- slopinthebag 6mo ago> I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. How is it an incorrect interpretation? Jared is indeed pitching/suggesting/predicting that human contribution will not be allowed in the near future, i.e. banned.
- Philpax 6mo agoA prediction is not a policy.
- sandbags 6mo agoWhen you use the word “allowed” it becomes a policy.
- NewsaHackO 6mo agoNo, it doesn't.
- sandbags 6mo agoWhat would be required for you to see it as a policy?
- kelnos 6mo ago"Pitching" generally means that the person making the pitch is endorsing and pushing for it. (This might also be a regional word meaning/usage difference type thing.) The person upthread should have said "predicting".
- lioeters 6mo agoWow, didn't realize how bad the situation was. Completely lost any respect and trust I had in the Bun project and its lead dev.
- kelnos 6mo agoWhat a weird take. I do a ton of OSS, and the act of writing code is what makes it fun for me. If I were forced to use an LLM to write all my OSS code, I would just not do it anymore.
- jdiaz97 6mo agohe clearly works for an LLM provider now
- Imustaskforhelp 6mo agoJesus christ, This is the thing which should be talked about more. What an abysmally bad take. This actually makes me worry about the faith of bun more than any other thing discussed here.