3 ms·
If the bill defines a charge cycle as 100->0->100 then the restriction should be more meaningful right? Manufacturers would have to ship a larger battery and ca
by in_cahoots 5mo ago
If the bill defines a charge cycle as 100->0->100 then the restriction should be more meaningful right? Manufacturers would have to ship a larger battery and cap its capacity to get the same lifespan.
- Kirby64 5mo ago100% and 0% are essentially arbitrary, though. That’s the point. What is 100% for a battery? 4.1V? 4.4V? What’s 0%? 3.0V? 2.5V? Lower?
- drfloyd51 5mo agoAnd to add to the confusion, the display reads 100% of the current capacity. 100% of 80%.
- Kirby64 5mo agoIrrelevant for state of charge, though. My point is you can define 0 and 100 as specific voltages and arbitrarily make the capacity larger or smaller. LG was notorious for having the top level charge be unusually high for the time (4.45V or something) which meant they had amazing battery life when new, but quickly fell off a cliff as they aged rapidly.