Seriously, the site had more downtime, more errors, and was slower than any site I have ever seen. I'm betting that you missed that though. The founders pored

Seriously, the site had more downtime, more errors, and was slower than any site I have ever seen. I'm betting that you missed that though. The founders pored so much money into just barely keeping their non-scalable site running that they completely watered down their share of the company. Is that what you call succeeding?