3 ms·
not really! at the very least it requires more thought around battery quality the choice for budget devices is now 1. better battery 2. removability (likely
by micromacrofoot 6mo ago
not really! at the very least it requires more thought around battery quality
the choice for budget devices is now
1. better battery
2. removability (likely more expensive and complicates water-tightness )
- alt227 6mo agoThe supposed aim of this is to reduce e-waste. But when 90% of smartphones sold are iPhones and Samsung Galaxies which are exempt it makes this bill completely pointless, as the ewaste it will save is a small fraction of a percentage of the total.
- micromacrofoot 6mo ago> the ewaste it will save well we agree that it will work at least a little, which looks like a good start to me
- alt227 6mo agoWe agree that it works a little, but not that it is a good start. If this bill had just targetted all battery devices it would have made an incredible change. But as usual it was lobbied into near non existence. Why do we have to be content with tiny chips away at a serious issue instead of insisting it is dealt with properly?
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]