4 ms·
I'm going to assume that the $200k number mentioned in the article refers to lost opportunity cost (compared to having a normal software job), and not that they
by stevenwei 14y ago
I'm going to assume that the $200k number mentioned in the article refers to lost opportunity cost (compared to having a normal software job), and not that they actually spent $200k in a two year timespan when they had no other income.
- mdonahoe 14y agoYou are correct. From the article: "Shawn and Stephanie Grimes’s efforts have cost $200,000 in lost income and savings"