3 ms·
I edited out the part where I was thinking OP may not get the best answers because HackerNews is pretty anti-Apple. I took that part out not because I don't sta
by Cookingboy 14y ago
I edited out the part where I was thinking OP may not get the best answers because HackerNews is pretty anti-Apple. I took that part out not because I don't stand up to my words, but because it doesn't contribute to my answer and may distract the conversation (you down-voted me over that part instead of my real answer is proof). I have no interest in starting or be involved in another flamewar whatsoever.
- mkr-hn 14y ago> "because HackerNews is pretty anti-Apple. I took that part out not because I don't stand up to my words," It is not. Why would you (wisely) edit that bit of idiocy out to avoid a flame war before putting it back in with two other comments? It's like you're desperate to get the stab in despite knowing what will happen.
- Cookingboy 14y agoI would greatly appreciate if you don't call opinions you disagree with "idiocy".
- mkr-hn 14y agoAn opinion with something to back it up can be discussed reasonably by reasonable people. Bold assertions with no backing are idiocy.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]