3 ms·
yeah, their shops arnt sized to do much more than UPS style package movement. I dont see it as a good value, but it's the only thing I see as a synergy. Otherw
by cyanydeez 6mo ago
yeah, their shops arnt sized to do much more than UPS style package movement.
I dont see it as a good value, but it's the only thing I see as a synergy. Otherwise it's just more garbage capitalism.
- alchemist1e9 6mo ago> garbage capitalism. How is this defined?
- jfengel 6mo agoMoving money around and pretending that there is more of it.
- alchemist1e9 6mo agoYou mean leverage/borrowing? Pretty time tested mechanism of risk taking in free markets.
- idiotsecant 6mo agoMoving money from one pile to another so that you can skim a little off the top is imaginary work and is slowly destroying the west
- smallmancontrov 6mo agoSlumlord owners of the network effect monopolies innovating ever lower investment in innovation and upkeep with ever higher increases in rent extraction, with a few nipple tassles slapped on the side to entice retail investor hype cycles.
- rchaud 6mo agoA few things come to mind: - SPAC IPOs that dodge standard disclosure requirements and worsen information asymmetry. See WeWork. - Board positions filled with CEO loyalists instead of independent directors. See OpenAI firing Altman before Microsoft reinstated him. - Management taking seemingly arbitrary decisions that turn out to be directly linked to their own compensation. SpaceX ordering a bunch of Teslas, or merging with a distressed asset (xAI). See above point on loyalist boards. - The very concept of leveraged buyouts where financiers borrow money to buy a company, then put the burden on repayment on the company AND pay themselves hefty management fees. This inevitably leads to layoffs and a rapid decline in product/service quality while the company is scrapped for parts.
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]