2 ms·

A malicious actor would be happy to be publicly labeled inexperienced/naive.

• doginasuit 5mo ago
  That reasoning holds but it is not based on any of the facts at hand. There's a reason why any community worth being apart of has a tendency to assume good faith. People make mistakes. I respect Don Ho's response and I don't see how the pitchfork brigade is bringing anything valuable to the situation.
  • f3408fh 5mo ago
    If you’d actually installed it and realized afterward that you’d been misled, whether by someone who doesn’t understand trademarks or someone acting in bad faith, you’d probably feel differently. Leaving a comment on HN in that situation is a pretty reasonable reaction.
  • lopis 5mo ago
    People are pissed because instead of taking the feedback, apologizing and acting immediately, he wrote comment after comment giving excuses. What he did is literally illegal, and ignorance or good intentions is not a solid excuse.
• i_think_so 5mo ago
  This. A billion times this. The community should be shouting from the rooftops that there is an intruder in the neighborhood. Maybe there's no malice intended and this is just a colossal pile of honest mistakes. Maybe this author is as clueless as he appears. Maybe, but until he appears at the United Nations and doxes himself before embarking on a world wide apology tour, nobody in their right mind should install that binary. I wouldn't even run the build script in a sandbox.
• wartywhoa23 5mo ago
  The inverse Hanlon's razor cuts much better than the original one these days: Never attribute to stupidity (incompetence|naivety) that which is adequately explained by malice.
  • doginasuit 5mo ago
    You don't need an inverse Hanlon's razor, that's the natural response and a recipe for a social dumpster fire.